Professional Educators and Democratic Classrooms
A key element of democracy is that individuals are given human rights and these human rights are respected by all and protected by the government. It makes sense then that on the first day of class teachers should introduce themselves by saying, “Good morning students, I am <state your name> and I am here to protect your constitutional rights.” In one sentence a relationship can be established that creates a feeling among students that their teacher is here to help and support each of them as individuals. Most students have some awareness of what human or constitutional rights mean, but they have not been in a classroom where it has been put into practice. When a teacher begins the first day of class by recognizing and protecting student rights, they have just introduced the first three of ten fundamental legal principles that are the heart of Judicious Discipline and provide the structure and framework for a democratic classroom.
Students learn their constitutional rights consist of three foundational principles: freedom, justice, and equality.
The lessons taught about rights and responsibilities must begin with students learning and talking about their rights. It is important students identify first with their own needs and desires. Moving too quickly to responsibilities tends to ignore the importance of empowering students with the language and how it feels to have rights.
After students learn about their rights in a democratic classroom, they need to know those rights are denied or moderated when they exercise individual rights that interfere with the welfare needs of others. In other words, students cannot say nor do anything they want to say or do; expression and movement are limited. Legally speaking, if educators can demonstrate a compelling state interest, the rights of students can be denied. There are four legal arguments our courts have used to protect the welfare needs and interests of the state. The four arguments are: Threat of Property Loss and Damage, Legitimate Educational Purpose, Health and Safety, and Serious Disruption of the Educational Process. As students learn to think and act using these four arguments as guiding principles, the language used in the classroom moves from autocratic talk to democratic talk. For educators it replaces telling students how to behave to reminding them of their civil responsibilities. For students it replaces obedience with responsibility.
Students will learn how these four guiding principles will deny and moderate their constitutional rights as educators present them as responsibilities associated with the expression of their rights. These responsibilities are:
The last three fundamental principles are time, place, and manner. “Time, place and manner” is a standard used by our courts as a criterion in deciding whether government has abused its authority in limiting individual rights. For example, if a student is distracted by something he or she brought to class, by asking the student if this is the best time, place, or manner to be playing with it, the educator reminds the student of his or her responsibilities and avoids a confrontation. By employing the language of reasonable time, place, and manner, educators reinforce responsible thinking in students who are beginning to use these concepts as organizers and an intrinsic rationale for determining for themselves what it means to be responsible.
These ten principles of democratic talk now become the language used by the classroom community. For example, instead of admonishing a student for harassing another with ‘stop bullying,’ educators can remind them of their responsibility by saying ‘health and safety.’ A teacher who sees a student damaging a textbook is often heard telling the student ‘that’s no way to treat school property.’ This would be replaced by asking, ‘Is there a property issue here?’ Questions using these principles avoid confrontations by separating educators from the rules and thus from an authoritarian role of telling students how to act. Refreshing a students’ memory emphasizes the power contained in a guiding principle and avoids the use of force which often results in counterforce from the student. When educators use language that empowers students with an intrinsic sense of responsibility, they find their students begin to move away from an obedience orientation to one of autonomy and self-control.
Involving students in setting up the rules or behavioral guidelines for the classroom is a first step towards giving students feelings of a sense of responsibility. When students develop the behavioral expectations or guidelines of the school and classroom, within the democratic structure described above, the community of learners takes greater ownership in their maintenance and further development. As a result, educators may not feel personally violated when behavioral expectations are broken by misbehaving students because educators can separate themselves from rules that are based on the same principles of civility we all live by in America. What better way to act in students best interests than for educators to help students learn to live responsibly in a free society.
When students mess up or stray from the class guidelines, the educator takes on the professional posture of one who works to help the troubled student come to terms with a problem situation. If educators are going to be effective in helping students recover from their misbehavior, get back on track, and do something else next time, they must create and maintain a “professional relationship” approach to consequences. A professional relationship can be defined as a fiduciary relationship in which students are entrusted to the care of educators. The professional ethics of this relationship is always acting in the best interests of those in our care. It is important, too, that each student believes his or her educator is always acting in his or her best interests. This is not easy for educators to bring about in a school setting unless students are included and feel some sense of responsibility in the relationship.
Developing a professional relationship with a misbehaving student begins with avoiding language and strategies that often lead to adversarial relationships. First, avoid lecturing students. Language like “I told you not to do that again’ and ‘you should be ashamed of yourself’ are usually voiced by educators to make themselves look responsible. Pointing out mistakes students already know about and retelling them what they have heard many times are examples of educators forcing the issue with guilt trips and threats in hopes of bring about compliant, submissive, or passive students. If students are going to learn to be responsible they should be doing the talking and the responding defensively to moralizing lectures.
Second, stop judging students. Playing judge and jury is the criminal justice approach often designed to humiliate, punish, and push students away from the learning community. Educators must learn to accept students exactly where they are now, assuming they have done the best they could. This does not imply that we agree with what they have done, it simply establishes a professional relationship with the student much like that of a doctor/patient or lawyer/client relationship. Misbehaving students are not asking educators to approve of what they have done, but they are asking for a professional educator to trust and understand that their behavior at the time was genuine and, under the circumstances, what they thought they needed to do at the time.
The first words spoken to a misbehaving student are always in the form of a question. The question empowers students to respond. The student talking is the one becoming responsible. Discourse encourages use of intellect and the associated feelings lead to mutual respect and responsible behavior for both students and educators.
Educators using a democratic approach to setting up school rules and classroom guidelines have separated themselves from the rules making it easier for educators to talk about rules without becoming defensive. By the same token, it is also easier for students to talk about their problems if educators separate students from what they did. This can be done by avoiding ‘why’ questions and focusing on questions related to what happened. ‘Why did you…,’ for example, focuses on the ‘you’, which often leads to defensiveness and litanies of excuses. Whereas ‘What happened’, asks students to describe ‘what’ occurred. ‘Would you like to talk about it?’ also emphasizes ‘it’ and thereby avoids students feeling they will be judged.
Once students have had an opportunity to respond (and regardless of what they say), the next question to be discussed is ‘what needs to be done now?’ This discussion with students revolves around what students need to do to put things back together and make things whole again. It is the legal concept of “restitution.” Also important are the feeling of others which may have to be considered. If feelings have been hurt, then some discussion regarding an apology should be considered.
When students have come to some resolution about what needs to be done about what happened, the next question to discuss is ‘what can we learn from this?’ Questions and discussions are related to changing goals and attitudes and talking about ‘what can we do next time so this will not happen again?’
It is important that throughout the whole discussion of consequences, educators must always respond to students in the form of questions. If students are reluctant to respond to questions or have no ideas, educators could ask question which introduce their own ideas for student consideration. For example, ‘what do you think about doing ____ as something you could do now?’ or what would happen if you did ____ next time?’ or ‘do you think an apology would help the situation?’ are some examples of questions which could be filled with ideas and next steps for students to consider. Decisions made from discussions must be volitional on the part of students. They must have the feeling they are making their own decisions and not playing off the authority of another. Troubled students are truly fortunate to be in the professional care of an educator committed to helping them recover and get back on track.
Guidelines and decisions based on democratic principles and consequences grounded in a professional relationship help bring students to a principled level of thinking. This reasoned and considerate approach to rules and consequences provides students with a paradigm they take to other social situations. There is a significant difference between learning obedience through rules and consequences designed to force behavioral changes and learning civil responsibility through the empowering language and discourse of professional educators. A democratic school experience is about developing learning goals with students designed to enhance character and courage which will hopefully provide them a presence of mind for living a life of equability and self-control.
Judicious Discipline, 6th Edition, Caddo Gap Press, San Francisco,
Last Updated September 20, 2014